Vulnerability Management

Turn a finding into a prioritized remediation task.

Connect software and configuration evidence to affected devices and responsible people. Review severity, matching limits and exceptions before planning and verifying the fix.

Vulnerability management

Source intelligence, affected inventory, decision, and remediation state
Context attached
Exposure workflowFinding to verification
01Find

Source and affected scope

Attached
02Prioritize

Asset and service context

Reviewed
03Remediate

Patch, script, or exception

Gated
04Verify

Fresh observation required

Awaiting
Illustrative Vulnerability management concept—not a live product screenshot.

The operator’s path

Find the issue. Act in context. Check the result.

Illustrative workflow · explore the steps · no action is executed

01

Match evidence

Correlate normalized software, version, operating system, certificate, security, and scan evidence with authoritative intelligence sources.

Confirm this step for your release, permissions and environment.

Connect a finding to the affected assets, owners, policy, and remediation work.

Correlate supported intelligence with current endpoint and network observations.

Drive patch, script, isolation, exception, and verification work through the normal control path.

Inside the workflow

The work this connects.

CVE and version matching
Map supported installed products and versions to vulnerability records while retaining source and match confidence.
Risk prioritization
Use CVSS, exploitability indicators, exposure, asset importance, age, and compensating control context.
Affected-device views
Group findings by customer, site, asset, software, vulnerability, severity, owner, and remediation state.
Patch and mitigation tracking
Connect patch availability and deployment to scripts, isolation, configuration mitigation, or other approved work.
Exception workflow
Record risk acceptance, reason, owner, approval, compensating controls, expiration, and required re-review.
Customer reporting
Produce scoped exposure, aging, remediation, exception, and verification views from governed source data.

Try one useful scenario

An expiring exception and verified remediation

Fictional example: a finding is reviewed as an uncertain match, assigned an expiring exception and then remediated after confirmation. A post-change check must establish the result.

Illustrative evaluation scenario, not a recorded product result.

What a useful result must show

Record source, affected version, observation time, false-positive rationale, exception owner/expiry, inherited-policy conflict, override authority and verification.

Get the evaluation worksheet →
Check the support boundaries
  • Inventory matching and source provenance
  • Configuration/certificate checks
  • Native scan versus integration findings
  • Freshness, false positives and isolation support

Detection does not imply endpoint-isolation support. No independent certification is asserted by this page; request dated control evidence through the security center.

Check public evidence and availability →
Scope, availability and evaluation details

Coverage and freshness depend on the available source, asset observation, matching confidence, and provider support.

Dayrook’s target scope includes risk workflow and evidence; it does not replace customer risk acceptance or an external assessor.

The proposed $99 monthly model includes the target product scope for evaluation, unlimited technicians, unlimited customers, and the first 50 managed devices. Final terms require confirmation. See transparent pricing →

Review full environment and integration scope

Intelligence meets observed inventory

CVE, vendor, package, and release sources correlate with endpoint and software inventory plus version intelligence while retaining source, observation time, match basis, and confidence.

Remediation closes through connected work

Findings link to patching, scripts, mitigation, isolation, service tickets, approved exceptions, verification scans, audit, and customer reporting instead of ending at detection.

Exposure connects to discovery, IT asset, RMM, patching, automation, service operations, exceptions, and reporting.

Questions, answered

Before you choose your next step.

Does Dayrook scan for vulnerabilities?

Dayrook correlates supported endpoint, software, configuration, certificate, and integration evidence with vulnerability intelligence and records the basis of each finding.

How does it prioritize findings?

Priority can combine CVSS, exploitability, exposure, asset importance, patch availability, finding age, and compensating controls.

Can technicians patch directly from a finding?

Yes when a supported patch or remediation exists and the device, policy, window, permission, approval, and agent checks pass.

Can a client accept a risk temporarily?

An authorized exception can record rationale, owner, controls, approval, expiration, and mandatory review without marking the finding remediated.

Your next step

Follow one finding through remediation.

Choose an affected device and confirm the match, severity and exception rules. Agree on the evidence needed to verify the fix.