iOS and Android on the same API contracts
The mobile app implementation uses Dayrook sessions and strict mobile contracts for alerts, tickets, devices, Digital Vault, backup, MDM, billing, support, push, and approvals.
Mobile
Explore the iOS and Android app implementation for alerts, ticket triage, approvals and vault access. Check release availability, offline behavior and access controls before relying on it on call.

Every access has a boundary
Review alerts, tickets, devices, approvals, and permitted Vault context from a trusted mobile session.
Illustrative workflow · explore the steps · no action is executed
Sign in with Dayrook Auth, register the mobile device, and apply tenant session, biometric, and notification policy.
Confirm this step for your release, permissions and environment.Open a push alert or browse devices, tickets, alerts, approvals, and permitted Digital Vault records in customer context.
Confirm this step for your release, permissions and environment.Acknowledge, reply, approve, or launch a supported device action through the same authorization and audit path as web.
Confirm this step for your release, permissions and environment.Keep action identity, tenant scope, MFA, device trust, and audit connected to the desktop workflow.
Inside the workflow
Mobile workflow evaluation
This action reviews implementation scope and its release boundaries. It does not offer a public mobile release or claim current device availability.
Review the mobile workflowTry one useful scenario
Fictional example: revoke a user while their client is offline, then attempt access before and after reconnecting. Test the approved offline expiry and confirm which cached items remain accessible.
Illustrative evaluation scenario, not a recorded product result.Record who can decrypt each credential class, recovery authority, local expiry, domain-match result and the observed revocation boundary. Inspect what leaves the client for breach checks.
Get the evaluation worksheet →The mobile app and browser extension are planned surfaces; signed distribution and a tested release are not evidenced here. A zero-knowledge claim for user vault items must not be generalized to automation credentials an executor is authorized to decrypt.
Check public evidence and availability →Mobile is a focused triage and approval surface, not a claim of complete desktop feature parity.
Offline data, remote actions, secret access, and revoked-device behavior follow tenant and trusted-device policy.
The proposed $99 monthly model includes the target product scope for evaluation, unlimited technicians, unlimited customers, and the first 50 managed devices. Final terms require confirmation. See transparent pricing →
The mobile app implementation uses Dayrook sessions and strict mobile contracts for alerts, tickets, devices, Digital Vault, backup, MDM, billing, support, push, and approvals.
Biometric secure storage protects permitted cached state, while APNs and FCM delivery uses a bounded push outbox and excludes sensitive operational content from notification bodies.
Mobile reuses the first-party identity, tenant, approval, ticket, device, billing, notification, and Vault owners.
Questions, answered
iOS and Android are the target platforms. Signed release tracks, push delivery, store availability, and deployed-device QA must be confirmed during evaluation.
Target design: Authorized Digital Vault records can be unlocked through the trusted-device and biometric policy, including controlled encrypted offline access.
It is designed for triage and bounded field workflows. Deep configuration and broad administrative work remain better suited to the web workspace.
Active authorization is ended and cached material follows the trusted-device revocation and offline-access policy.